股典钟涨停王语音播报资讯:顶层思维做投资Stock code clock daily limit king voice broadcast information: top-level thinking to invest
来源:股典钟涨停王Stock Code Clock Daily Limit King | 作者:股典钟涨停王Stock Code Clock Daily Limit King | 发布时间: 2021-08-24 | 639 次浏览 | 分享到:
顶层思维究竟是什么?有个粉丝朋友啊不断私信我这个问题。他说最近总听到我提顶层思维,但每次呢又不讲透,很着急。哎呀,有些东西啊只。
能点到极致。这样我们今天简单讲讲好不好?如果用一句话来讲明白顶层思维,我认为就两个关键词,一个是底线思维。
一个是路线思维,底线思维就是中美休息里的陷阱。这个已经非常非常明确了。我们不可能有任何侥幸心理,而且只有一条路。
就是越过这种打伞,没有其他道路可选。所以底线思维的本质就是要做好最坏的准备,而且也必须要做好这个准备。那么什么叫最坏的准备啊?
两个大力士,哪一天真的大家将来像很早的时候我们能活下来,而且还能让对方也不好过。那哪些地方他会下狠手呢?比如能源。
比如芯片,比如农业,那为什么一定要搞新能源?为什么半导体必须要搞好?为什么粮食安全那么重要?一就在这里,在决战到来的时候。
高手之间是不能有命门留给对方的,否则趴下的就是自己。所以我们这几年天天在讲的卡脖子技术,就是要把自己的照门在决战之前啊。
赶紧补补。好,明白了底线思维的危机意识,我们就会明白,对于顶层来说,g d p 都不是什么重要的东西,这些都是和平年代的粉丝制度。如果连g d p 都不是第一性。
那么那些不帮忙还添乱的行业又算个啥呢?该拿捏一定可怜。在真正的大战之前,看上去重要的很不重要。看上去不重要的。
可以很重要,这就是底线思维对投资人和创业者要紧紧的地方。路线思维就是东方大国的理念。世界东方文化的骨子里,不管是哪种主义。
啊,天下大众的性命是不会丢失的。大家想一想是不是这样的,也不用去区分什么个人还是集体,效率,还是公平。家国一体的本质不会变。
你问每一个中国人,你说家重不重要?当然重要,国呢一样重要。所以当我们过去四十年还吃不饱穿不暖的时候,效率比公平重要。当大家现在小康了。
那么既要效率,也要经过公平。这时候追求共同富裕,就是我们当下最大的目标。等哪一天共同富裕也实现了天下大同了。
那么公平又比效率重要了,这就是一个周而复始,不断轮回的过程。啊,于是在这个效率和公平兼顾的阶段,如果你一味的追求效率,不考虑公平。
那么迟早会有反思,过去几年从互联网金融开始的教育,再到演艺圈,住房问题繁荣大问题。哪一个不是冲着公平去呢?如果这时候有人还只管市场经济的效率和自由。
你这不是跟我们的理念世界背道而驰吗?那你的宗旨是什么?不注定了吗?顶层思维需要顶层意志,意志越坚定越长期,那么动作一定越直接。
越干脆看看每一次的自上而下有过一点拖泥带水嘛。所以未来我们的财富逻辑跟过去只追求效率的时代会发生明显的不同。
那么未来我们赚钱的逻辑会是什么样?该如何用顶层思维指导我们做企业做投资呢?抱歉,在公开平台我们只。
What is the top-level thinking? A fan friend keeps sending me this question in private. He said that recently he always heard me mention top-level thinking, but every time he didn't explain it thoroughly, he was very anxious. Oh, there are some things.
Can reach the extreme. So let's talk briefly today, OK? If you understand the top-level thinking in one sentence, I think there are two key words, one is the bottom-line thinking.
One is line thinking, bottom line thinking is a trap in Sino-US rest. This is very, very clear. We cannot have any luck, and there is only one way.
Just go beyond this kind of umbrella, there is no other way to choose. So the essence of bottom-line thinking is to be prepared for the worst, and you must also be prepared for this. So what is the worst preparation?
Two Hercules, which day will everyone really be able to survive like a very early time in the future, and also make each other feel bad. So where would he be ruthless? Such as energy.
Such as chips, such as agriculture, so why do we have to engage in new energy? Why do semiconductors have to be done well? Why is food security so important? One is here, when the decisive battle arrives.
There can be no life gate between the masters for the other party, otherwise it is yourself who will get on the ground. So the choking technique that we have been talking about every day in the past few years is to take our own camera before the decisive battle.
Quickly make up. Well, if we understand the crisis awareness of bottom-line thinking, we will understand that for the top level, g d p is not an important thing. These are fan systems in the peaceful era. If even g d p is not primary.
So what are those industries that don't help and cause chaos? It must be pitiful. Before the real war, what seemed important was not important. It doesn't seem important.
It can be very important, and this is where the bottom line thinking matters to investors and entrepreneurs. Line thinking is the idea of ​​a great eastern country. No matter what kind of doctrine is in the essence of the world's eastern culture.
Ah, the lives of all the people in the world will not be lost. Everyone think about whether this is the case, and there is no need to distinguish between individuals and collectives, efficiency or fairness. The nature of the unity of home and country will not change.
You ask every Chinese, do you say that family weight is not important? Of course it is important, but the country is just as important. Therefore, efficiency is more important than fairness when we have not had enough food and clothing for the past 40 years. When everyone is now well off.
Then there must be both efficiency and fairness. At this time, the pursuit of common prosperity is our biggest goal at the moment. Waiting for the day when the common prosperity also realizes the great harmony of the world.
So fairness is more important than efficiency. This is a cycle of cycles and cycles. Ah, so at this stage of balancing efficiency and fairness, if you blindly pursue efficiency, don't consider fairness.
Sooner or later, there will be reflections. In the past few years, from the education of Internet finance, to the entertainment industry, the housing problem is a big problem. Which one is not aimed at fairness? If at this time someone still only cares about the efficiency and freedom of the market economy.
Don’t you run counter to our world of ideas? What is your purpose? Isn't it doomed? Top-level thinking requires top-level will. The stronger the will, the longer the action, the more direct the action must be.
The more simply look at each time there is a little muddy from top to bottom. Therefore, our wealth logic in the future will be significantly different from the past when we only pursued efficiency.
So what will our logic of making money look like in the future? How to use top-level thinking to guide us to invest in companies? Sorry, we only on the open platform.


Ah, the lives of all the people in the world will not be lost. Everyone think about whether this is the case, and there is no need to distinguish between individuals and collectives, efficiency or fairness. The nature of the unity of home and country will not change.
You ask every Chinese, do you say that family weight is not important? Of course it is important, but the country is just as important. Therefore, efficiency is more important than fairness when we have not had enough food and clothing for the past 40 years. When everyone is now well off.
Then there must be both efficiency and fairness. At this time, the pursuit of common prosperity is our biggest goal at the moment. Waiting for the day when the common prosperity also realizes the great harmony of the world.
So fairness is more important than efficiency. This is a cycle of cycles and cycles. Ah, so at this stage of balancing efficiency and fairness, if you blindly pursue efficiency, don't consider fairness.
Sooner or later, there will be reflections. In the past few years, from the education of Internet finance, to the entertainment industry, the housing problem is a big problem. Which one is not aimed at fairness? If at this time someone still only cares about the efficiency and freedom of the market economy.