股典钟涨停王行业新闻：年入百万者都在做什么工作Stock Code Clock Daily Limit King Industry News: What are the jobs that earn one million people every year

2021-04-21

最近有个话题很有意思啊，胡润发布了一个标准，里边说中国一线城市入门级的财富自由门槛是一千九百万啊，很多人看到了这份榜单之后，都默默的关掉了手机。
脑子里只有一个问题，上哪挣那么多钱呢？
啊，坦白说这个问题我回答不了，但换一个角度呢，我们来讨论一下那些年入百万以上的人都是做什么的。
希望给你点启发。我周围年入百万的人还挺多的啊，我把他们分为了三类。第一类就是金融圈的同行，一种是做业务的市场人员。
第二种就是做交易的基金经理，尤其是基金经理啊，资深一点的免入千万的都有。而且金融圈是个很稳定的行业，基本我身边入了行的。
没有出去的，因为门槛儿啊，壁垒啊都很严格。据我所知，现在的毕业生想进头部券商的核心部门清北复交第一梯队。
两台一帽都分到了b 端。第二类啊有连锁服装店的老板，咨询公司的老板，创投合伙人做教育的。
做医美的卖商用飞机的，搞工程的，做会展的，还有互联网公司中高层地产公司中高层保险经纪人。
总结一下有什么共性吗？要么是自己创业的，要么就是知名大厂的中高层。有个观点你要改变一下了。这个年头如果你说在国企打工，公务员饭碗。
想年入百万还真有点难。
第三类呢是内容创作者，主要就是各个自媒体写文章的，做视频的、打游戏的，做直播的什么类型都有啊。我前面说的那两种人群多少需要。
多年的自身努力或者家庭背景支撑，而内容创业者啊很多都是一个爆款就爆发身价瞬间就上来了。但这事儿你别觉得很容易。
更多需要的是天赋。观众妹妹都在。
Recently, there is a very interesting topic. Hurun released a standard. It says that the entry-level wealth freedom threshold for China's first-tier cities is 19 million. After seeing this list, many people silently shut it down. Cell phone.
There is only one question in mind, where can I make so much money?
Ah, frankly speaking, I can't answer this question, but from another perspective, let's discuss what those people with an annual income of more than one million do.
Hope to give you some inspiration. There are quite a lot of millions of people around me. I divide them into three categories. The first category is the counterparts in the financial circle, and the other is the market personnel who do business.
The second type is fund managers who do transactions, especially fund managers, who are more experienced and exempt from tens of millions. Moreover, the financial industry is a very stable industry, and I basically entered the industry by my side.
Those who did not go out, because the thresholds and barriers are very strict. As far as I know, current graduates want to enter the first echelon of Qingbei, the core department of the leading brokerage firm.
Both of them are assigned to end b. The second category includes the bosses of chain clothing stores, the bosses of consulting companies, and venture capital partners for education.
Those who sell commercial airplanes for medical beauty, those who do engineering, and those who do conventions and exhibitions, as well as the middle- and high-level insurance brokers of Internet companies, middle-level and high-level real estate companies.
To sum up, are there any commonalities? Either you start your own business, or you are a middle-level and high-level man of a well-known company. There is a point of view that you have to change. If you talk about working in a state-owned enterprise this year, civil servants will have a job.
It's really hard to make a million a year.
The third category is content creators, mainly those who write articles from various media, do video, play games, and do live broadcasts of all types. The two groups of people I mentioned earlier need them.
Years of self-efforts or family background support, and many content entrepreneurs are just a hit, and their value instantly comes up. But don't think it is easy for you.
What is needed more is talent. The audience sisters are all there.

股典钟涨停王技术知识：龙头股心法Stock Code Clock Daily Limit King Technical Knowledge: Leading Stock Heart Method

2021-04-20

今天给大家分享九点如何做龙头股的心法。第一，你的自选股里应该只放龙头，谁给买点就买谁，凡是非龙头放在备选男。
是次要难。第二，早盘前三十分钟只看几个龙头的走势，非龙头看都不要看。如果非要看，等半个小时过去再说。第三，强制自己。
只与龙头发生关系。
有走龙头就不要做分龙头。第五，有黏板的龙头就不要做反包的龙头。第六，有煮生的龙头就不要做反抽的龙头。第七。
主线的龙头就不要做支线的龙头。第八有名牌的龙头就不要去挖什么暗线的龙头。第九，有市场，选出的龙头就不要做。
Today, I will share with you the nine points of how to be a leading stock. First, you should only put the leader in your self-selected stocks. Whoever buys something will buy it. If you are not the leader, you should put it in the candidate man.
It is a secondary difficulty. Second, only watch the trend of a few leading players in the first 30 minutes of the morning, and don't watch non-leading players. If you have to watch it, wait for half an hour. Third, force yourself.
Only have a relationship with the leader.
If you have a leader, you don't have to be a leader. Fifth, a leader with a sticky board should not be an unpackaged leader. Sixth, if there is a cooking faucet, it is not necessary to be an anti-pumping faucet. seventh.
The leader of the main line does not need to be the leader of the branch line. Eighth, if there is a famous brand leader, don't dig any hidden leader. Ninth, if there is a market, the selected leader will not be required.

股典钟涨停王技术新闻：深度思考者Stock Code Clock Daily Limit King Technology News: Deep Thinker

2021-04-19

你想成为一个有深度的思考者吗？看到那些总是能处乱不惊，一针见血，直击本质，一鸣惊人的人，是不是偶尔也会羡慕？如果你曾试图模仿他们。
会发现自己只不过是在东施小平假装思考，永远替代不了真正的思考。其根本原因在于你所看到的这些都只是表现出来的结果。
重点问题在于他们是如何思考的。比如老婆年薪百万，你要不要当全职爸爸？一般人看到这个问题，本能的反应会是要好处是什么什么。
要坏处是什么什么，其实啊这都是非常初级的线性思考。真正的高手看到这类问题会如何思考呢？其实看起来悬壶的深度思考。
是有机可循的，它包括从个体到整体，从单一要素到系统思考，从现象到本质逐步深入层层递进的过程。
当然这些方法看起来还是很抽象，但是思考的本质就是从具体到抽象的还原过程。老婆年薪百万，你要不要当全职爸爸？
真正的高手思考问题往往有三个特征，第一，从个体到整体，第二从单要素到系统思考。第三，从现象到本质。第一个。
从个体到整体，意思是你讨论的对象不仅要包括丈夫、老婆或者孩子中的任何一个个体，还要把整个家庭系统作为一个整体。
去考虑他们的利害关系，任何一方的获益都可能带来另一方的让步，这是需要平衡的。第二，单个要素到系统思考。
是指不仅要考虑这些对象某一方面的影响，还需要动态的考虑这些对象之间的相互关系的变化。比如丈夫做了全职爸爸之后。
妈妈和孩子的亲密关系会不会发生转变？这种转变是好是坏呢？有没有什么对策来平衡？第三，从现象到本质是指。
我们探讨问题啊，不仅仅停留在问题的细节本身，而是要看到这个问题背后所覆盖的问题。即便老婆不是年薪百万，那这个问题所映射出来的哲理对自己的生活有没有启示？
那我们在讨论要不要当全职爸爸的时候，背后是不是隐藏着全职妈妈就很合理的隐含假设。我们是不是本质上在讨论。
家庭角色分工和内心价值排序的问题呢，当然每个人都会得出不同的结论，这取决于你自己的经历和价值观。
重要的是，只要你开始这样思考问题，就已经渐渐远离了简单的线性思考的困局，成为一个会深度思考的人。
前提是摆脱本能的线性的、碎片化的思考方式问题啊，就像一个迷宫。而当你习惯于这样的思考，就等同于。
掌握了迷宫的地图看。
Do you want to be a deep thinker? Seeing those who are always able to deal with chaos without surprises, hit the nail on the head, hit the essence, and blockbuster people, do you occasionally envy them? If you have tried to imitate them.
You will find that you are just pretending to think in Dong Shi Xiaoping, and can never replace real thinking. The fundamental reason is that what you see is just a manifestation of the results.
The key question is how they think. For example, if your wife earns one million a year, do you want to be a full-time dad? When most people see this problem, their instinctive reaction will be what are the benefits.
What is the disadvantage? In fact, this is all very basic linear thinking. How would a real master think about this type of problem? In fact, it looks like a deep thinking about hanging pots.
It is organically followable, and it includes the process from individual to whole, from single element to systematic thinking, and from phenomenon to essence.
Of course, these methods still seem very abstract, but the essence of thinking is the reduction process from concrete to abstract. My wife earns a million a year, do you want to be a full-time dad?
The real master thinking problem often has three characteristics, first, from the individual to the whole, and second, from the single element to the system thinking. Third, from the phenomenon to the essence. First.
From individual to whole, it means that the object of your discussion should not only include any individual among the husband, wife or children, but also the entire family system as a whole.
To consider their interests, the gains of any one party may bring concessions to the other party, which needs to be balanced. Second, single factor to system thinking.
It means not only to consider the influence of one aspect of these objects, but also to dynamically consider the changes in the relationship between these objects. For example, after the husband became a full-time father.
Will the close relationship between mother and child change? Is this change good or bad? Are there any countermeasures to balance? Third, it refers to from the phenomenon to the essence.
When we discuss the problem, we should not only stop at the details of the problem itself, but also see the problems covered behind the problem. Even if the wife does not earn one million a year, does the philosophy reflected in this question have any enlightenment for one's own life?
So when we are discussing whether to be a full-time dad, is there a reasonable implicit assumption behind whether there is a full-time mom. Are we essentially discussing.
Regarding the division of family roles and the ranking of inner values, of course everyone will come to different conclusions, depending on your own experience and values.
The important thing is that as soon as you start thinking about problems in this way, you have gradually moved away from the dilemma of simple linear thinking and become a person who can think deeply.
The premise is to get rid of the instinctive linear and fragmented way of thinking, like a maze. And when you are used to thinking like this, it's the same.
Master the map of the maze.